Thursday, on social media, Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy attacked President Trump, strangely implying that Trump was transforming the U.S. into a “Banana Republic” after the president called for an investigation into Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
The senator posted his comments on Twitter within minutes of the president urging the Department of Justice to not let Debbie Wasserman Schultz and her IT staffer Imran Awan “off the hook” for a growing server scandal that Schultz has tried to cover up since the inception of what may be the biggest scandal out there, the details of which have gone virtually unreported by the liberal mainstream news media.
Trump said, “They want to make a ‘plea deal’ to hide what is on their Server. Where is Server? Really bad!”
Our Justice Department must not let Awan & Debbie Wasserman Schultz off the hook. The Democrat I.T. scandal is a key to much of the corruption we see today. They want to make a “plea deal” to hide what is on their Server. Where is Server? Really bad!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 7, 2018
Soon after, the senator chimed in: “Just FYI Republicans, when the United States is a banana republic in 10 years, how do you think you’ll feel about being silent when our President told his DoJ to start arresting his political opponents?”
Just FYI Republicans, when the United States is a banana republic in 10 years, how do you think you’ll feel about being silent when our President told his DoJ to start arresting his political opponents? https://t.co/CiyiImMw2N
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) June 7, 2018
What these two tweets concern is a recent report that claims the IT staffer Imran Awan is seeking a plea deal with the DOJ over the missing server, which started speculation that he is willing to cooperate against Wasserman Schultz. Someone better hire a food taster for Awan.
This is one of the biggest scandals of the day. The DNC has made the claim that Russians hacked their servers and got the Podesta emails that were delivered to Wikileaks. Many now believe the hacks were an inside job by the Awan family. It is also known that even though it had been reported that Awan was suspected of hacking Democrat servers, Wasserman Schultz refused to fire him. She later claimed she didn’t fire Awan because of her oath to protect people from racism. Really? How about Wasserman Schultz didn’t fire him, because she didn’t want to do anything that would bring light to the situation and expose the data that was on the server? At the time nobody knew that Hillary Clinton and Wasserman Schultz rigged the primary for Clinton against Bernie Sanders, or that Clinton took over the financials of the DNC, because Barack Obama left the organization virtually broke. What other problems existed on that server?
The server in question went missing, as happens so often, but only when Democrats are in trouble.
This story stinks any way you look at it. First off, an IG report showed that 44 Democrats waved background checks on Awan and his family as they signed on to do their IT work. It would be nice to hear why, other than there’s a loophole that allows a waiver based on the recommendation of another member of Congress already doing a background check. So, who did a background check on Imran Awan and his family? I don’t think anyone knows.
Wasserman Schultz refused to let the FBI take a look at their servers. Why would Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the DNC Chairwoman at the time, refuse to let the FBI, a premier computer forensics investigative agency, from looking at their servers? What were they hiding?
In testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee in January 2017, then-FBI Director James Comey confirmed that the FBI registered “multiple requests at different levels,” to review the DNC’s hacked servers. Ultimately, the DNC and FBI came to an agreement in which a “highly respected private company”—a reference to CrowdStrike—would carry out forensics on the servers and share any information that it discovered with the FBI, Comey testified.
What you may not know is that CrowdStrike received $100 million financed by a funding drive via Google Capital.
Google Capital, now CapitalG, is an arm of Google’s parent company, Alphabet Inc. Alphabet’s chairman, Eric Schmidt, is a Clintonista who actively supported Hillary Clinton and a longtime donor of the Democratic Party.
The law firm Perkins Coie that represented the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign, recruited CrowdStrike to come in and help the DNC with their allegedly hacked servers.
Perkins Coie was also the firm that paid Fusion GPS to create the highly discredited anti Trump dossier, for the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign, that was compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.
Wasserman Schultz went on CNN and made claims that the FBI “did virtually nothing” to help the DNC after news of an alleged Russian hack on their servers broke and that they never asked to see them.
Wasserman Schultz is a pathological liar. Not only did she deny that the FBI ever asked to see the servers when they became aware of complaints about being hacked, but she went into details that sounded very convincing to anyone who doesn’t know she’s insane.
A senior law enforcement official tried to convince the DNC of the importance of the FBI being able to gain access to the servers, and the request was denied by the DNC.
“The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated,” the official was quoted by the news media as saying.
“This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third party for information. These actions caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier,” the official continued.
This is classic cover up stuff. Senator Murphy must believe that the president and the DOJ should let crimes in government go when there’s a D next to the names of those under suspicion. How Democrat of him.