Research psychologist Robert Epstein joined Tucker Carlson on Thursday night. Epstein says that Google can take a 50/50 vote and by censorship and manipulation of searches change the vote to 90/10. I no longer use Google search because, on major stories, you have to go to page 3 or 4 to find a non-liberal source for the story. The social media says it is not responsible for every comment made on their pages because they aren’t publishers. That is a lie. When you start editing or censoring stories, you are indeed a publisher. When you take full control of what readers see, you are then solely responsible for your content.
From The Gateway Pundit
In a previous appearance on Tucker Carlson Tonight Epstein revealed that Google can take a 50-50 split among undecided voters and change it into a 90-10 split with no one knowing they had been manipulated and without leaving a paper trail… It has to do with their search suggestions.
On Thursday Dr. Epstein revealed that just one Google shift in search results on Election Day 2018 shifted from 800,000 to 4.6 million votes to Democratic candidates.
This follows the shocking Breitbart exposé by Allum Bokhari published Thursday that proves Google has been manipulating search results.
Of course the Big Tech companies have only been targeting only conservative websites and publications since the 2016 election.
So, is there any way social media can be punished for their actions in the 2018 elections? Well, you can’t write a new law to cover a previous bad act, but you can utilize a current law. The manipulation of data benefited Democrats greatly. That contribution would be known as a PIK. (Payment in Kind) or a non-cash contribution. The value of those services would be way over the contribution limits for the candidates and the Democrat party. They sent Dinesh D’Souza to prison for that, so why not the executives of all the Tech giants?
BOOK – Why I Couldn’t Stay Silent
Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr